Other possible John Anna Porter people I’ve seen provided right up…

Other possible John Anna Porter people I’ve seen provided right up…

(and just why they are probably wrong):

Why should they have some other James in the event the very first one is however to? 1638 is pure eÅŸleÅŸme sorunu believed getting the season out of immigration; the only real admission into the Parish information to have an effective James Porter, kid from John and Anna Porter, is actually for the one “officially” listed above that has been Baptized 20 Feb 1627. Perhaps this go out is signifying as an alternative an adoption types of situation having whoever John Anna left James that have when they went along to America, or he had been lso are baptized…? Simply throwing stuff available to choose from.

Unrealistic. Sometimes he and Sarah was basically twins or Anna had intimate right back to help you straight back pregnancies; maybe not into the Parish info, neither mentioned in John Porter’s tend to.

Maybe their last son, however if thus, he need passed away young as there is not any mention of a child Joseph into the John Porter’s usually – really, okay, okay, yes discover, however, one to “kid Joseph Judson” is basically speaking about a boy-in-law, maybe not a physical guy – that is probably where dilemma already been. That record says Joseph was born in Felsted, Essex, The united kingdomt – the family are gone by this go out, therefore if that is correct, next it Joily.

ANNA-HANNAH-BO-BANNA-JOHANNA-FlowerANNA-FO-FANNA-ME-MI-MO-MANNA-Flower!

Whenever studying certain Porter histories and you can nearest and dearest trees, there’s some definitely significant confusion having Anna’s title and lots of daughters and you can blend them all up – there can be Anna and you will Flower, then there is Johanna and you will Hannah, who possess one another become known as Anna, leading to the new misunderstandings.

That have Anna, while i first started seeing the lady referred to as Flower, We believed that perhaps John Porter nicknamed Anna their “Rose”, by using the nickname afterwards whenever naming one of the lady. Then again, We unearthed that John had a cousin Flower, and now believe it absolutely was just an earlier error in which some body confused Anna that have John’s aunt early on and you may/or later on due to their daughter Flower, in the course of this lady passing.

As well as, I do believe the oldest girl, Anna (Anna per Parish suggestions) and Johanna usually listed on many John Porter-Anna Light records, is actually one to in addition to same. Zero Johanna is said during the early Parish details. Uncertain where in actuality the label Johanna originated from (though I have a concept lower than and it is a great fusion of mom father’s labels), however in the will (note: dos eldest daughters, Anna and you may Sara commonly said inside the John’s will while they received the piece when they hitched), pursuing the two eldest sons, the kids was placed in birth order (earliest guys, next women), that have a keen Anna listed past. In this case, as to the reasons another Anna? Met with the earliest Anna become going by Johanna from this time, so they really e once again, otherwise was it constantly Johanna, however, mislisted for the Parish suggestions? Did it phone call each of their people Anna. Did John build their will themselves otherwise was just about it transcribed of the someone? I am aware the fresh new youngest “Anna” is basically Hannah, and therefore musical nearly alike.

Requires alot more search, however, we all know one to John Anna’s d Gaylord; Frequently, John Anna’s boy John had a child named John just who married a good Joanna Gaylord, who was simply brand new Grandd Gaylord (so they was indeed cousins after they married); Even though a couple of generations out of, the similarity inside the labels is actually undeniable – my personal gut informs me this is most likely where Anna/Johanna misunderstandings originates from.

IMMIGRATION

Intricate ship directories of several of your own very early arrivals try not available for several reasons, but among those explanations was once the getting an occasion while in the Massachusetts Bay Colony’s Governor John Winthrop’s period, the guy chose to n’t need a single list of guests and you can as an alternative approved only a complete count. Their checklist admission for around step 1 September 1638 and therefore taken into account 20 vessel arrivals more than one to june is actually short-term:


Beitrag veröffentlicht

in

von

Schlagwörter:

Kommentare

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert